Sacrificed to Dionysus? – Are Blacks really the scapegoats of White religiosity?

 

A review of:

 

Orlando PATTERSON, 1998, Rituals of Blood: Consequences of Slavery in Two American Centuries. New York : Basic.

 

By:

 

Chris BRAND (author of THE g FACTOR and research consultant to the Woodhill Foundation, USA)

 

 

This book's author is a well-fed Black sociologist at Harvard University who wears a suit, tie and glasses and sympathizes with Christianity. He has a wife called Anita. Patterson thanks Anita for her "information and insights about her native culture, America", so Anita may be White. In any case, Patterson is a stylish writer who is as at home with social statistics as with Madonna's complaints that her one-time Black lover -- the basketball star and transvestite, Dennis Rodman -- failed to give her cunnilingus when the pair met for sex. More especially, Patterson abjures constructivism; he thinks American Blacks are in a "desperate" state of criminality, drug-addiction and family breakdown; he agrees that Black teenage pregnancies are "catastrophic" for both mother and child; and he denies that Black social problems are attributable to poverty or to the daily grind of White racism. In 1993, he took the trouble to denounce the more Afrocentric versions of multiculturalism that were being touted by Black racists (such as university-employed Lionel Jeffries Jr.) for America's schools. Altogether, Patterson looks as promising a Black sociologist as Whites are likely to find. 

 

What, then, can have inspired Patterson's latest title, Rituals of Blood? Why, nothing less than a belief that Black ghetto bastardy and violence – not least to Black women and in turn from these women to their Black children – can be blamed on nineteenth-century Whites. These primitives, not content with enslaving Blacks and denying them marriage prospects, proceeded to hack off Blacks' ears, fingers and genitalia in the process of roasting them alive at joyfully attended lynchings. According to Patterson, this meant that Black males were in no position to supply adequate male role models to the children they casually sired; that Black womenfolk learned to despise them; and that Black men in turn came to hate their own mothers and Black women in general. By all means, the modern world has witnessed what Patterson obligingly agrees is a marked lessening of White savagery and even of White racism; and Black sportsmen like O. J. Simpson have been venerated by White sportslovers (at least till O.J. murdered his wife then shamelessly played the race card at his trial) and made into American multi-millionaires. Yet Patterson sees only more trouble ahead. Niggas with attitude, like the musician Puff Daddy, apparently serve the function only of letting Whites indulge the 'Dionysian sides' of their natures. Meanwhile, rap artistes lead Black youth to impossible dreams and to a sustained non-involvement with the normal world of work and family life that will outlast all the corresponding efforts of affirmative racists and welfarists. In their "Dionysian entrapment", "hypnotized" Black youth replace Uncle Tom's cabin in the sky with the "all-or-nothing hope of one day slam-dunking the basketball net" and head towards their "fateful moment" of the gathering future. 

 

At the core of this dramatic account of forever-collapsing Black culture lies an impressive collection of survey statistics which bolster Patterson's feminist analysis of the essential modern problem of American Blackdom. So hostile and suspicious are the two Black sexes that 46% of Black men have never been married (compared to only 27% of what Patterson calls 'Euro-American' men). A Black woman in the USA can expect to spend just 22% of her lifetime being married (compared to the 43% spent by Euro-American females in one or more viable marriages). Surveys reveal the reasons for the frostiness between the Black sexes: 56% of young Black men say they cheated on even their very first sexual partner – which the refreshingly judgmental Patterson finds nothing short of "deplorable." "….the great majority of Afro-American mothers," says Patterson, "have been seduced, deceived, betrayed and abandoned by the men to whom they gave their love and trust." Tracing these problems further back, Black children experience high rates of sexual abuse: Blacks are a minority of the population in Chicago, but 70% of child sex abuse in that city is Black-on-Black. Nor does Black isolation occur just because a third of young Black men are in jail at any one time. Contrary to what Patterson calls the myth of Black brotherhood, Black men have markedly impoverished social networks compared to Whites; and their minimal contacts seldom link them with any realistic world of employment that is both gainful and legal. Contrary to what White sociologists have believed, Black boys' gangs do not in fact include relatives: the Black 'extended family' is actually a myth. Poverty is emphatically not the problem, says Patterson: being unmarried and friendless are especially frequent for Blacks at both ends of the social scale.

 

Thus it is that Patterson proposes his solution to US Blackdom: that the urban ghettos be broken up and Blacks dispersed among Whites who will be further assisted to marry them by laws which would guarantee Blacks 'equal opportunity' to marry a decent proportion of Caucasoids – who currently miscegenate freely with all races/ethnicities except the unhappy Negro.* Admittedly, Patterson also urges that Black men should "radically alter their ways" and "change their gender attitudes"; but he has no confidence that Black men will respond to this "sociological imperative" to repair a culture of mistrust that is "execrable", "disastrous" and "grievous." Hence the need for Blacks to "engage more in out-marriage" and reap the "exchange of cultural dowries" currently enjoyed among themselves by Whites, Latinos, Mexicans and Asians.

 

 

What can be said of this engaging thesis before 'equal opportunity' enthusiasts take their next step forward to oblige childless White suburban women to take Black lodgers and turn them swiftly into husbands? There are in fact three remarkable omissions from Patterson's story.

 

First, the attribution of Blacks' problems to White enslavement and the "lynching cult" neglects that Africa had its own pattern of Black-on-Black slavery, inter-tribal violence and brutal tyranny long before White sailors ever showed up to buy the slaves readily supplied by Black potentates and princelings. The notorious Zulu king Chaka was witnessed despatching 60 twelve-year-old boys before breakfast and massacring 500 women for witchcraft -- see Burnham, 1993. Patterson's only acknowledgment of such historic Black brutality is in an entirely unlikely and unsupported claim that centuries of enslavement by fellow Blacks "would have weighed traumatically on the minds and souls of West Africans and their descendants", "[making] the slave gulags of the Caribbean harder to endure." Surely it is more likely that White slavery would have come as a considerable relief from the African variety. Anyway, the first few hundred thousand slaves in the USA were actually Whites, and they managed without any spectacular 300-year slide into criminality, bastardy and unemployability (except for a few descendants in the Blue Ridge Mountains). Nor was there cultural breakdown among the Asian labourers of California and Canada whose 'indentured' bondage typically lasted longer than that of Black slaves (who were themselves treated as valued possessions and often manumitted by their White masters). Patterson challenges conventional Holocaust piety by claiming that the slave gulags and "the Afro-American holocaust" were "arguably the worst nightmares of human brutality in the history of the world", but he does not even glance at the hundred million people killed by Stalin, Hitler, Hirohito and Mao – savagery which began with Stalin's killing of the half-a-million Jews who had enthusiastically joined the Russian Communist Party. Whereas Jews, Cambodians and today's people of Nanking have survived their respective horror stories and moved on, Blacks continue to set an unedifying counter-example of human feebleness. Altogether, Patterson fails to establish his causal thesis that the White man's slave trading can be blamed for anything very much.

 

How, then, do there occur the appalling relations between the Black sexes? Astonishingly, Patterson shows little sign of having heard of Africa -- let alone of personally visiting or studying the Dark Continent. On West Africa's Gold Coast, he could easily have learned that women mistrust Black men and that men reciprocate exactly in the pattern of America's slave-holding South and the inner-city ghettoes of Kingston and London today. Just as in Virginia of 1800, hardly any Black woman in West Africa will trust her man for a day. Familiar with her husband's whoring ways with his 'secretaries' in every dance hall in town, and finding no serious protection from preacher men, Black women of the Gold Coast have long contented themselves with the business careers advocated today by Western feminists – with a toyboy on a 'scholarship' to keep them company at weekends when they take time off from bribing customs officials. Patterson has apparently not even read the writing of the Black Washington Post staffer, Keith Richburg, who took a sabbatical in Africa in 1996 and returned to give US Blacks the message that they were lucky that the White slave ships had fetched them out. Inter-sex suspicion is a staple of Black lifestyles – as might be expected in any group where sexual activity is the main fun in life (with 23% of American Black women reporting two or more orgasms during their last sex session, compared to only 11% of Whites). Given 1990s appreciation of the role of female orgasm in boosting the likelihood of fertilization, it is small wonder that the one really successful part of Black life gives rise to considerable uncertainty about paternity and to mutual recriminations. Needless to say, contraceptive restraint forms no part of Blackdom. Contrary to the evidence that it is actually the White race which is now dying out, American Blacks believe, says Patterson, that "birth control is a plot to kill the Negro race."

 

As its last omission, Rituals of Blood entirely ignores the levels of crime, bastardy, welfare dependency and inter-sex suspicion among Whites having the same levels of IQ as Blacks. Despite The Bell Curve having copiously documented the causal role of low IQ in social pathology (for a summary, see Brand, 1996, Chapter 4), the names of Charles Murray, Richard Herrnstein, Arthur Jensen and Phil Rushton are simply not thought worth a mention by a Harvard sociologist – indeed, intelligence and IQ also remain unmentioned. Such a high level of wilful ignorance is astonishing. Patterson should recall Mark Twain's observation that a man who won't read books can claim no serious superiority over a man who can't read them.

 

 

Rather than consider empirical evidence of what is the most likely cause of Black problems – in low IQ, not in distant enslavement by Whites – Patterson prefers to persist with a striking thesis that Whites have a special religious relationship with Blacks, regarding them as biblical scapegoats who can satisfyingly be roasted by insertion of red-hot iron rods and made to eat their own penises, followed by their testicles. Supposedly, there would sometimes be a mystic "hush of transition" at lynchings where barbecueing of Black rapists took place. (Whether this hush occurred at the 6% of lynchings that were Black-on-Black is not stated.)

 

In fact, it was only at one American lynching in ten that any singeing or mutilation occurred; and if Patterson thinks Whites specially like taking things out on Blacks he should really read a few newspaper accounts of Europeans' 1990s atrocities in Serbia and Chechnya. It is nice to encounter a fine writer who does not blame the wretchedness of Black culture on poverty; but if Patterson expects success in arguing that Black preachers will lead Whites out of expiatory Pauline Christianity into non-sacrificial Southern Baptistry and inter-racial brotherly love, he will first need to show he can tackle simpler tasks. Blaming the institutionalized violence of rap musicians "ensnared in Dionysus" partly on White corporate sponsorship and its "lucrative industry of managed frenzy" is fair enough; but Patterson needs to ask himself why most Whites simply breathe a sigh of relief that Blacks receive plentiful offers of lawful work as 'singers', boxers, basketball stars and Cabinet members for President George W. Bush.

 

For Patterson to suppose that Blacks are enduringly exploited – even sacrimonially – by Whites must invite, in 2001, the response that Blacks are not kept in the USA by means of any Berlin Wall. And Patterson's idea that the enduring popularity of the barbecue in Texas is due to its reminding participants of the delightful smell of roasting Black flesh comes from the wildest shores of paranoid Black over-inventiveness. Today, 90% of inter-racial hate crime in the USA is Black-on-White despite Whites in the police and media being reluctant to pursue Black racists. Patterson should attend to this simple and sobering fact and trace Black mayhem and self-destruction not to Whitey but to the very same genes that have made Africa notorious for its rates of under-age rape, illiteracy, superstition, corruption, wife-beating, prisoner mutilation, unemployability and AIDS. Patterson can be congratulated on an engaging book -- which includes both an intriguing finding that a history of child sexual abuse halves the divorce frequency among White women and an investigable (if currently unsupported) claim that Black-White miscegenation makes for "creativity." Patterson is plainly a superstar among Black social scientists. Sadly, he is quite as irresponsible as the Black artistes he discusses.

 

 

*  The idea of forced residential integration for Blacks and Whites was first put forward by the 'liberal'-left social psychologist Marie Jahoda -- 1960, 'Race relations and mental health', in Race and Science: Scientific Analysis from UNESCO. As a neo-Freudian, Jahoda had brought herself to belief that all racial prejudice was just a 'projection' – e.g. of the White id on to Black people, followed by criticism of Blacks for being 'over-sexed.' In reply, A. James Gregor pointed out that Whites had many reality-based reasons for keeping their wives and children out of contact with Blacks – 1961, Mankind Quarterly 1.

 

 

 

REFERENCES

 

BRAND, C. R. (1996). THE g FACTOR: General Intelligence and Its Implications. Chichester, UK : Wiley DePublisher.

BURNHAM, Stanley (1993). America's Bimodal Crisis: Black Intelligence in White Society. Athens, Georgia : Foundation for Human Understanding.

 

 

 

Edinburgh

May, 2001